Click here for PDF Edition

2017-05-05 digital edition

TODAY in the Jewish World:

Click on logo for link:

Click on logo for link:

The Jewish Press of Tampa and the Jewish Press of Pinellas County are Independently- owned biweekly Jewish community newspapers published in cooperation with and supported by the Tampa JCC & Federation and the Jewish Federation of Pinellas & Pasco Counties, respectively. Copyright © 2009-2018 The Jewish Press Group of Tampa Bay, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


May 5, 2017  RSS feed
Front Page

Text: T T T

Most Jewish groups oppose pulpit politicking

By Ben Sales JTA news service

Jewish groups largely came out against a new executive order allowing clergy to endorse or oppose candidates from the pulpit, fearing that it will erode the separation between church and state.

The order, which President Donald Trump signed May 4, at the White House, effectively reverses a 1954 regulation called the Johnson Amendment that prohibited houses of worship and faith groups from endorsing or opposing candidates. Offending houses of worship would lose their tax-exempt status.

Trump has long promised to do away with the law, which he sees as restricting religious freedom, but Jewish organizations had urged him to leave it intact.

After the signing, several Jewish groups and leaders came out against the executive order, saying the amendment was a bulwark that prevents the mixing of prayer and politics. They noted that religious groups are free already to advocate for issues and political causes, if not candidates.

Last month, a range of Jewish organizations was among more than 4,000 nonprofit groups that signed a letter in support of the Johnson Amendment.

“Clergy and communities of faith already raise our voices loudly on issues of political and social concern,” Rabbi Jonah Dov Pesner, director of the Religious Action Center, Reform Judaism’s legislative advocacy arm, said in a statement May 4.“The prohibition against endorsing or opposing political candidates from our pulpits simply prevents groups from being simultaneously tax-exempt ministries and partisan political outfits.”

Throughout his campaign and afterward, Trump has maligned the amendment as a muzzle on the free speech of clergy. In February, he vowed to “totally destroy” it.

At the signing ceremony, Trump invoked the history of church-driven social change movements in America, referring to the activism of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights movement. He called the amendment “very, very unfair” and told clergy that “you’re now in a position where you can say what you want to say, and I know you’ll only say good and you’ll say what’s in your heart.”

“Free speech does not end at the steps of a cathedral or a synagogue, or any other house of worship,” the president said. “We are giving our churches their voices back, and we are giving them back in the highest form. The federal government will never, ever penalize any person for their protected religious beliefs.”

The executive order pledges to “vigorously enforce federal law’s robust protections for religious freedom.” It also promises to “address” regulations that prohibit employers from denying coverage of contraceptives to employees on religious grounds.

At least one Jewish group, the Orthodox Union, applauded the order. It welcomed a change of course in the executive order, which also directs federal agencies to make it easier for employers with religious objections not to include contraception coverage in workers’ health care plans.

“We are grateful that President Trump has made it clear that his administration will promote and protect the religious liberty of Americans of all faiths wherever possible,” Nathan Diament, the O.U.’s executive director of public policy, said in a statement Thursday. “We look forward to working with the White House, Justice Department and others to implement the principles laid out in today’s executive order.”

A full repeal of the Johnson Amendment can happen only through an act of Congress. But Trump’s order directs the Internal Revenue Service not to prosecute violations of the Johnson Amendment by houses of worship, effectively ensuring that they won’t face repercussions from the law.

“The Founders envisioned a nation in which religious voices and views were integral to a vibrant public square, and in which religious people and institutions were free to practice their faith without fear of discrimination or retaliation by the federal government,” the order reads.

Americans’ support for the order’s central action appears to be low. According to a March poll by the Public Religion Research Institute, only 22 percent support clergy making endorsements from the pulpit.

Rather than loosening the reins on churches, opponents of the order say defanging the Johnson Amendment could put houses of worship in a bind. On the same day Trump signed the order, Reform Rabbi David Saperstein testified before a House subcommittee on the law. He said congregants could now pressure clergy into endorsing candidates, creating potential for divisiveness in congregations.

“What is a pastor to do if a congregant who is a major donor now makes his church gift contingent on an endorsement from the pulpit for his or her preferred candidate?” asked Saperstein, a former U.S. ambassador-at-large for religious freedom. “Once down that path,” he said, “painful pressure to endorse any congregant running for office arises.”

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Click ads below for larger version