Click here for PDF Edition

2013-09-06 digital edition

TODAY in the Jewish World:

Click on logo for link:

Click on logo for link:

The Jewish Press of Tampa and the Jewish Press of Pinellas County are Independently- owned biweekly Jewish community newspapers published in cooperation with and supported by the Tampa JCC & Federation and the Jewish Federation of Pinellas & Pasco Counties, respectively. Copyright © 2009-2018 The Jewish Press Group of Tampa Bay, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


September 6, 2013  RSS feed
Front Page

Text: T T T

U.S. Jewish groups back Obama on Syria, but downplay concerns for Israel

By RON KAMPEAS JTA news service

Israelis face long waits to receive free gas masks at a distribution center in Tel Aviv – a scene being played out throughout Israel amid new fears of a possible chemical attack by Syria. Israelis face long waits to receive free gas masks at a distribution center in Tel Aviv – a scene being played out throughout Israel amid new fears of a possible chemical attack by Syria. WASHINGTON – Jewish groups backing President Obama’s call to strike Syria militarily are citing moral outrage and U.S. national security as primary considerations, but concern for Israel – however muted – also looms large in their thinking.

A lingering sensitivity over misrepresentations of the role of the pro-Israel community in the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003 kept Jewish groups from weighing in on Syria until it was clear that President Obama was determined to strike. Now that same sensitivity is leading them to downplay any mention of Israel.

Officials of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, finishing up a conference call Tuesday, Sept. 3, with top security advisers to Obama, waited until the White House staffers were off the call before urging constituent organizations not to make their statements “Israel-centric.”

Notably, Israel was not mentioned in any of the three statements that emerged immediately following the conference call, which was convened to solidify support for Obama’s call for a strike. The statements – from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Anti-Defamation League as well as the Presidents Conference – only alluded to Israel.

“America’s allies and adversaries are closely watching the outcome of this momentous vote,” the AIPAC statement said. “This critical decision comes at a time when Iran is racing toward obtaining nuclear capability. Failure to approve this resolution would weaken our country’s credibility to prevent the use and proliferation of unconventional weapons and thereby greatly endanger our country’s security and interests and those of our regional allies.”

The statements focused on the need to contain a nation that has crossed a red line by using chemical weapons against its citizens.

“Those who perpetuate such acts of wanton murder must know that they cannot do so with impunity,” the Presidents Conference statement said. “Those who possess or seek weapons of mass destruction, particularly Iran and Hezbollah, must see that there is accountability.”

Israel nonetheless loomed large in an off-the-record conference call between Jewish officials and two of Obama’s top national security advisers. One Jewish official asked whether the United States would assist militarily should Syria attack Israel. (The answer: Yes, but it is the U.S. assessment that Syrian President Bashar Assad is not that reckless.)

One of the White House officials repeatedly emphasized that acting to keep Syria from using chemical weapons was a critical step to keeping Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The vocal support of American Jews comes as Obama ramps up efforts to win congressional support for a military strike.

“This is a limited, proportional step that will send a clear message not only to the Assad regime, but also to other countries that may be interested in testing some of these international norms, that there are consequences,” Obama said.

Until Obama declared his readiness to strike Syria on Saturday, Aug. 31, Jewish groups had been reluctant to weigh in – in part because of the hangover from unwarranted attacks blaming Jewish lobbying for the Iraq War. But in the wake of Obama’s declaration, those fears seemed to evaporate.

“The president has made his decision and we’re not ahead of it,” Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, told JTA. “He’s not doing this for Israel. This may have serious ramifications for Israel which are negative.”

U.S. administrations have traditionally sought Jewish support for foreign policy initiatives, but in this case, congressional insiders say the influence of AIPAC and other Jewish groups may be checked by the emergence of other foreign policy constituencies.

Since the 2010 midterms, the Tea Party caucus among Republicans, which has a prominent isolationist streak, has resisted AIPAC pressure to back a robust foreign assistance program. Among Democrats, the insiders said, progressives wary of another foreign war are likelier to heed anti-war voices than the pro- Israel lobby.

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), who is Jewish and has been a pro- Israel and progressive stalwart, has been a leading voice of skepticism about a strike. Other Jewish lawmakers have robustly backed a strike, preeminent among them Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee and one of the highest profile Jewish lawmakers.

Wasserman Schultz invoked the Holocaust in making her case. “As a Jew, the concept of ‘Never again’ has to mean something,” she told CNN.

Leading rabbis covering the religious and political spectrum echoed those sentiments in a letter urging Congress to support the president’s call for a strike in Syria.

“We write you as descendants of Holocaust survivors and refugees, whose ancestors were gassed to death in concentration camps,” stated the letter signed by 17 rabbis. The signors included Rabbi Eric Yoffie, a past president of the Union for Reform Judaism; Rabbi Yosef Blau, the rosh yeshiva at Yeshiva University; leaders of the Conservative movement; and essayists such as Leon Wieseltier and Rabbi Joseph Telushkin.

“Through this act, Congress has the capacity to save thousands of lives,” the rabbis wrote in the letter, timed for delivery just before the Days of Awe from Rosh HaShana to Yom Kippur.

Some groups have been lobbying for weeks. An official in the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) said the office has been flooded with calls and emails from Jewish federations and constituents urging the lawmaker to back Obama’s plan.

Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), the most senior Jewish member of Congress, cited a key Israeli concern – that an Assad unscathed after using of weapons of mass destruction would embolden Iran – in explaining his support for the president.

“America has a compelling national security interest to prevent and respond to the use of weapons of mass destruction, especially by a terrorist state such as Syria, and to prevent further instability in a region of vital interest to the United States,” he said in a statement.

The government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has remained relatively quiet on the Syria matter in part, its officials said, because it sees no good outcome. In his Rosh HaShana message, Netanyahu said Israel is following the developments in Syria “very closely,” and that “if it is necessary, we will act with resolve to protect our people.”

Such a posture is markedly different from late 2005, when Israeli officials urged U.S. Jewish groups to talk President George W. Bush out of considering regime change in Syria. The Israelis argued that as bad as Assad’s government was, the alternatives were worse.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Click ads below for larger version